Guest Reviews
← Back to the main guide: FIT Hostels
Hostel’s Guest Reviews:
Positive & Bad reviews are CRITICAL to this FIT Traveler’s wise hostel selection. They are my “ultimate litmus test” of a hotel’s WORTH AFTER I have balanced the VALUE of their price versus amenities.
Cautionary Notes:
1) A hostel’s position on hostelworld.com hostel’s listing page is based on each individual hostels’ commission paid to hostelworld.com and other factors, just like Google’s sponsored priority system, …. just so you know. Make your own decision!
2) I use the Review Ratings as my primary quality screen knowing that I may eliminate some researched hostels based on other factors.
3) “Tip: use the Rating’s number & value word to begin your search
1. Benefit to FIT travelers of POSITIVE Guest Reviews:
Positive Reviews are reassuring:
“Carly was so friendly & helpful, even helping me book a bus ticket”, “Carly insured I got a lower bunk because at 72, it is dangerous for me to climb into top bunk; also very clean bathroom toilets & showers.”
a. Booking Platform Ratings: Positive reviews boost a hostel's ranking in hostelworld.com, hostel.com , etc. like ‘cream rising to the top.” Especially for FIT travelers, solo backpackers and budget travelers who rely on Guest Reviews to validate the trustworthiness of a hostel’s claims of vibe, cleanliness, social atmosphere, and value.
b. Rely on Mutual Trust & Credibility amongst of FIT Travelers & Hostel Guest’s: I accept legitimate authentic "word-of-mouth" Reviews from former hostel guests as truthful, helpful & unbiased.
c. A strong mix of positive & negative Guest Reviews can enhance Hostel’s trustworthiness rather than an a question of ‘suspicious perfection’, particularly regarding a hostel’s current status of quality & performance.
d. Reassures (“great staff”, “wifi in dorms”), positive reviews reassure while negative feedback cautions (“noisy dorms”, “smoking in dorms”, “smelly bathrooms”).
THEN , the wise FIT Traveler shifts to Guest’s NEGATIVE Reviews to further test the hostel’s claims of vibe, quality, and amenities.
2. Benefit to FIT travelers of NEGATIVE Guest Reviews:
Bad reviews are the FIT traveler’s ‘flashing red lights’ signaling that a negative Issue was so important to a previous guest that they took the time to comment: “smelly showers’, “rude staff”; …. often on more than 1 travel platform.
a. Why Peeps post Bad Reviews?
1) anger: “rude staff’, “smelly toilets”, etc,
2) public service to WARN future guests : “no wifi in rooms”; only common room”, “refrigerator is too small for all guests to use”
3) WARNING: Vengeance Reviews: Some reviews are ‘personal’, … designed to inflict unfair damage on the hostel or its personnel. Usually, this is subtly obvious by the attacker’s choice of words and issue.
My Hypothetical Example of Vengeful Review: “Terrible bathrooms because rude ugly witchy maid let the mirrors get fogged up during my shower.”
(Rememberer, I made this up.)
I dismiss these nasty transparent vengeful attacks with sympathy for hostel management & staff. They serve no useful purpose.
b. What are Guest’s Benefits of Bad Reviews?
1) A traveler’s litmus test of hostel management’s quality claims.
2) Indicator of hostel’s responsibility & commitment to guests, or not.
3) Clue that hostel’s management should NOW be aware of guest dissatisfaction.
4) Potential future guest's are being warned of possible suspicion & mistrust.
5) Travelers ‘see & avoid’ as they research & curate hostels in their desired area.
c. What are Hostel’s Management’s Benefits of Bad reviews
1) Hostel Management’s bellwether of guest dissatisfaction
2) Warns of potential severe damage to a hostel’s reputation,
3) Warns management of blind spots,
4) Lost income, profit & industry respect
Experienced FIT Travelers avoid hostels with
bad reviews: signals real, recurring problems
no reviews: Too much unknown risk
owner-ignored bad reviews: poor management & No Accountability
d. Hostel Management’s Golden Response Opportunity:
Hostel Management has at least 2 options to Bad reviews: 1) No Response, & 2) Response.
1) No response, IMO, is
a) a de facto, implied confirmation of a reviewer’s VALID negative complaint,
b) cowardly mismanagement,
c) researching FIT Traveler’s see as suspicious & indicative of ‘NOT caring’,
d) management’s tacit acceptance of hostel’s lost income etc., including mine,
e) Competition will NOT recommend when they are fully booked.
Anecdote: Lonely Planet’s most popular Rome hostel referral: I arrived in Rome with no pre-booked hostel (???), but my strategy was to ask at most p[opular Lonely Planet Rome hoste l…knowing..they’d be fully booked & would immediately recommend another nearby hostel. This top hostel immediately recommended a hostel a few blocks away where I stayed for several days.
Anecdote: San José de Jáchal, Argentina: Arriving with out a pre-booked hostel, I approached this 1st Lonely Planet hostel I could find. The kindly lady jumped on the phone and called other hostels until I was booked. Might be harder today as FIT Travel increases.
2) Response: IMO a wise response includes
a) a quick & candid apology, (even if just being diplomatic to a vengeful reviewer)
b) reassures Complainant & subsequent Guest Review readers that management takes their concerns seriously,
c) explain a clear, appropriate & feasible ‘correction’,
d) graciously welcomes the Complainant Reviewer back to hostel too confirm solution.
A class act management response.
3) Benefits of response:
a) Hopefully, issue is solved and hostel is improved,
b) ALL future travelers who read Guest Reviews will appreciate, respect, & be reassured by management's forthright response & solution.,
c) Hostel’s credibility & trust is enhanced thereafter.
d) Hostel retains financial viability.
e) EXAMPLE: of My India’s pre-trip itinerary of some good & bad and mixed notes.
Good: (Note: I use a lot of abbreviations for myself. So, PLS, figure them out)
Mad Backpacker’s HOS: REV: GUD: Location: metro booking, Staff; Wifi-OK “Review: good location to metro, offers Train booking, good staff, wifi acceptable, but maybe not great”, peaceful,
Bad:
Review: GUD: breakfast, staff, KIT ;Note so good: dirty, need extra sheet beneath blanket; old INDIA men use, no wind, BAD: wifi, Location: hard to find, not near sites; Train/metro : 10m by tuk tuk,
Mixed:
Review: GUD: clean, staff,
Not So GUD: poor wifi, not near sites, hard to find, 30 min to metro
Subscribe!
Join my mailing list to get new content notifications.